Understanding MoveJ vs. MoveL in Robot Programming


In the world of industrial robotics, programming the movement of robotic arms is a fundamental aspect that determines efficiency, precision, and the overall success of automated processes. Two commonly used movement commands in robot programming are MoveJ (Move Joint) and MoveL (Move Linear). These commands are integral to defining how a robot moves from one point to another. By delving into the specifics of MoveJ and MoveL, we can uncover when it is best to utilize each command.

What is MoveJ?

MoveJ, or Move Joint, is a robotic movement where the robot moves through its joint space to reach a designated target position. In this mode, each joint of the robot moves independently to reach its respective position in the most efficient manner possible. The path taken by the end effector is not linear and can be somewhat unpredictable, as it is determined by the joint positions rather than the end effector’s trajectory through space.

Advantages of MoveJ

  • Speed: MoveJ is often faster than MoveL because it allows the robot to move all its joints simultaneously, optimizing the path based on joint movement.
  • Efficiency: Ideal for situations where the path of the end effector is not critical, and the primary goal is to move from point A to point B as quickly as possible.

What is MoveL?

MoveL, or Move Linear, commands the robot to move its end effector in a straight line from its current position to the target position. Unlike MoveJ, MoveL focuses on the linear trajectory of the end effector through the workspace. This ensures that the tool follows a precise path, which is crucial for tasks requiring high precision and consistency.

Advantages of MoveL

  • Precision: Ensures a predictable and straight-line movement, vital for applications like welding, painting, dispensing, or any task where the path of the tool is critical.
  • Simplicity: Simplifies programming for tasks that require a straightforward, linear path, reducing the complexity of ensuring that the end effector moves precisely as intended.

When to Use MoveJ vs. MoveL?

MoveJ is best used when...
  • Speed is a priority over the precision of the end effector’s path.
  • The robot is moving between positions where the exact path of the end effector is not critical.
  • Optimizing cycle time is essential.
  • The task allows for flexibility in the movement path.
MoveL is best used when...
  • The task requires the end effector to follow a specific, linear path, such as in assembly, welding, or dispensing applications.
  • Precision and repeatability of the end effector’s trajectory are critical to the task’s success.
  • The application involves working closely with fixed objects or in tight spaces where the path of the end effector must be controlled to avoid collisions.


Understanding the nuances between MoveJ and MoveL commands is crucial for robotic programmers and engineers to optimize the efficiency, speed, and precision of robotic systems. While MoveJ offers speed and efficiency through joint-based movement, MoveL provides the precision and predictability of linear trajectories. Selecting the appropriate movement command based on the specific requirements of each task can significantly enhance the performance and outcome of robotic automation projects. As technology advances and applications become more complex, the strategic use of these commands will continue to play a pivotal role in the evolution and optimization of industrial robotics.

1 Like